Writers, money and the web (bonus part six): online residencies

Eh? Online residencies? I mean blog residencies, of course.
Actually, there are heaps of bloggers out there who get paid to blog – corporate bloggers, I would call them, such as those who run the Intrepid blog, That’s Melbourne blog, publishers’ blogs, and a million others.
But there are also bloggers and writers out there who get paid to blog by a parent publisher, who then publishes all the content on its own site. For example, the bloggers at Crikey get a stipend for publishing on that site (I have no idea how much), and also get the benefit of being promoted alongside the brand of the parent publisher. It’s a sweet deal but I’m not sure how easy it is to swing a gig like that.
Sometimes blogs offer a deal like that but on a short-term, or ‘residency’ basis. The State Library of Victoria‘s Inside a Dog website pays its resident bloggers, for example. I’m sure there are other government and arts examples out there, and maybe some corporate ones too. Again, it’s not exactly an easy gig to swing, as they’re usually not advertised spots but by invitation only.
I think blog residencies will soon become more prevalent. It’s already happening locally – the Melbourne Writers Festival had bloggers writing throughout the program, though I understand they were unpaid. And I think that paying resident bloggers will become more prevalent as the writing form legitimises (which is happening slowly).
Take the new Wheeler Centre (the institution formerly and briefly known as the Centre for Books, Writing and Ideas) as an example. I think they’re perfectly placed to run a blogging residency program. It could work like this: any existing blogger could apply for the program, if they were going to be in Melbourne for a certain amount of time. They would then attend events at the Centre, and blog about their experiences of literature in Melbourne. This would be paid, and would give the Centre great, ongoing, and constantly engaged content, and also expose the Centre to a broad community (each blogger’s existing audience, which would presumably come from all corners of Australia and the globe). It would also give the Centre an opportunity to legitimise blogging as a form of writing by offering payment for its residents. (Note: rather than telepathically receiving and instigating my idea, the Centre decided on a different way to blog; see Dailies, a kind of clunky-working blog but a cool idea.)
When I say residency, I really mean something ongoing rather than a guest post here and there. And I think residencies should be paid, as a column in a magazine or newspaper would be paid.
Of course, this has little to do with this series, really, as it’s not necessarily about self-generating income or doing something on your own site. Though I think that writers who already blog will be in good positions to put themselves forward as residents when the concept starts becoming more prevalent.
*Occupying my thoughts: are writers who blog different from bloggers? Of you’re a writer who blogs do you consider yourself a blogger?
*Photo by Mait Jüriado.

LiteraryMinded
12:54pm, 27 Nov 09
Sometimes a good writer can be a crap blogger, yeah?
Love your idea for the Centre. That would work well.
I just got invited to a festival and for the first time, besides just doing panels, the director asked me specifically if I could ‘blog the festival’, which is great because I do this anyway – because my audience digs festival stuff. It was just great that that was acknowledged as one of the reasons they want me there!
lisa
12:57pm, 27 Nov 09
Yeah, and a good blogger might not be very good at other kinds of writing. I guess one of the things I associate with blogging is the community connection – belonging to web rings, commenting on each other, creating online friendships, etc. Although I do some of those things, I guess I don’t really consider myself a ‘blogger’. I think it’s all lumped in together because we all use the same platforms… or maybe I’m overthinking it.
Rebecca
12:13pm, 1 Dec 09
I consider myself a writer who blogs. Blogging is not my primary occupation. I don’t know if being a writer makes me a better or worse blogger (maybe this changes?) I just know I do both.
estelle
10:23pm, 2 Dec 09
Yep, I didn’t get paid for blogging the Melbourne Writers Festival.
I consider myself a ‘blogger’ only insofar as I have a blog and I update it regularly. I just hate the word. I think it’s an exemplar of verbal ugliness, and it has a technoconscious aesthetic to it that I kind of shy away from. That might seem disingenuous and a shrugging off of the medium, which isn’t what I’m trying to get at. I also think it has some negative connotations; many ‘other writers’ find blogs distasteful, and sure, they can be done badly, but there are also more shit novels out there than i’d care to throw a stick at.
I guess the word ‘blogger’ is still kind of a bare descriptor and doesn’t really encompass all the potential of the medium — we haven’t coded ‘blogger’ with as much cultural evidence as we have, say ‘novelist’ or ‘newspaper journalist’ or ‘poet’ (though there’s a lot of baggage with that one!) For that reason — furthering awareness of the legitimacy of the platform — I think it’s important to continue using the terminology, but sadly I can’t bring myself to do it very often. It’s also pretty difficult to explain it any other way — ‘self-funded, advanced-technology savvy, independent, multi-platform arts/cultural journalist/commentator’? At the end of the day, though what we really do is write, hey.
estelle
10:24pm, 2 Dec 09
Oh my god, what a rant!
lisa
10:31am, 3 Dec 09
Yay, a rant!
I see myself as a writer who blogs rather than a blogger. I’ve had an anon(ish) blog in the past, and when I was writing it I identified as a blogger, and actively tried to be a part of the community – i.e. left comments on other blogs, joined in memes, was on blogrings etc. Now I’m less interested in being a part of the blogging fraternity and more interested in connecting to a broader cultural communityu (via online mediums as well as off), and self-publishing my thoughts online; a blog is just a tool I use to reach those ends rather than an end-point in itself. I dunno. I’ve tried to explain this quite a few times and I don’t think I’m expressing myself very well. But in my mind there’s a difference between a blogger and a writer who blogs. Of course, by my distinctions, you could also have a writer who was a blogger.
And… this is categorisation that works in my head and I don’t even know if it’s worth discussing or trying to break down.
And I agree ‘BLOG’ is a very bad word. It makes me think of doing a poo for some reason – the sound of it, I think.
genevieve
5:12pm, 3 Dec 09
And a beautifully articulated rant it is too, Estelle. I agree that blogger is a silly word, already moving into history as we breathe (and as one of my friends likes to say – remember to breathe.)
There used to be a style and a space that just belonged to a blogger. I think it’s in a serious state of flux. Though being invited to blog a festival and NOT be paid? HEY????? apart from stinking, that is a sublime example of people not understanding the medium’s liquidity at all. (Heh, blogger = intern, iz people we don’t pay to do what we would have to do ourselves otherwise.)
I am going to take a bit of a break from the content production side of it for a while – and looking forward to just hanging and talking. And reading. So I guess when you look at it like that blogging does have that flexibility – though I guess writers can just read too!
estelle
11:27pm, 3 Dec 09
Lisa: definitely the ‘rhyming with bog’ factor. I think everyone will have a slightly different take on what it means to be a blogger, but I totally agree that I have a blog in order to practice and organise my writing in a space that is mine and coherent.
I think there definitely is a difference between a writer who blogs and a blogger. And I don’t think they’re mutually exclusive, but that confuses the point some more. Help! We’re in terminology quicksand.
Gen: I can only hope nobody noticed my appalling punctuations and idea segues.
I should have realised that my bare statement re MWFBlog above would seem like a bomb waiting to explode, when I should explain that it wasn’t anything like that. I offered to blog for MWF on a volunteer basis, because I knew that the festival runs on lots of volunteer juice. It was something I really wanted to do, because I think festivals and blogging are a natural fit. It also seemed like a good deal for me because I received access to every event I wanted to go to, as well as every writer I wanted to speak to (well, email). So I would definitely see it as having been a case of mutual gain; not just to be politic, but I guess it was a gamble on both our sides. You know, I could have just been someone who wanted to get free tea all day from the green room (uhh…)
I think the ‘hanging and talking and reading’ comment is pretty much exactly how I feel about blogging practice and communities.
estelle
11:28pm, 3 Dec 09
‘Punctuations’???
lisa
7:04am, 4 Dec 09
Also, includes the word ‘log’… ewwww…
genevieve
2:00pm, 29 Dec 09
Estelle, what punctuation difficulties? all your segues are the suavest.
I agree that if there is some kind of payment in kind (free sessions are indeed a motivating factor) and that the blogger is part of a wider volunteer workforce, that lessens the pain. Still not ezackly crazy about it though :d and I’m not sure why. But the main thing is that the blogger makes the choice, so far be it from me to be prescriptive about these things.